Innovative and Aggressive Continuous Sewer System Assessment Program
Last Modified: Apr 16, 2013
- Sean FitzGerald – Hazen & Sawyer
- Brandon Vatter – Sanitation District No. 1 of Northern Kentucky
Many utilities throughout the United States are facing the reality that their underground sewer assets are deteriorating and many have reached the end of their useful lives. In addition, the Capacity Maintenance Operation and Management (CMOM) portion of the proposed SSO Rule is being included in many NPDES permits as well as Consent Decrees.
In April 2007, Sanitation District No. 1 of Northern Kentucky (SD1), which serves over 97,000 customer accounts in Campbell, Kenton, and Boone Counties, entered into a Consent Decree with USEPA Region 4 and the Kentucky Division of Water (KDOW) to address CSOs and SSOs in the sewer system. The Consent Decree requires the District to conduct a CMOM self assessment as well as a Nine Minimum Controls Compliance (NMC) Evaluation to document their degree of compliance with NMC and CMOM requirements.
One result of the audit and compliance evaluation was the development of an aggressive and comprehensive Continuous Sewer Assessment Program (CSAP) that will include O&M goals related to the NMC and CMOM in the same program. This presentation will document the development and implementation of the District’s CSAP, which began operation in January 2008. The overall goal of the program is to cost-effectively minimize O&M related spills and to implement system renewal and rehabilitation in a way that targets dollars where they have the highest benefit. For the collection system, the benefit is a reduction in sewer failures and failure consequences.
The CSAP comprises six individual O&M programs that include a prioritized, structured, and perpetual approach to preventative O&M, sewer assessment and sewer rehabilitation. The overall structure of the program is based on an Asset Management approach. That is, the program will be set up to prioritize assets based on their consequence and likelihood of failure. This approach helps ensure cost-effective use of rate-payers money considering that there are many other needs that the District must address as part of the Consent Decree implementation. The six individual O&M programs include:
A key feature of the POMP is the priority-basin approach. The Districts sewer system is divided into approximately 250 gravity drainage basins, 182 of which are in the separate sewer system. These 182 basins comprise the priority basin area. The priority basin approach essentially means that assessment and rehabilitation activities will focus on an entire basin at a time. This allows for efficient use of CCTV and engineering resources while still focusing on areas that need the most attention. There are three exceptions to this approach. These are pipes located within 50’ of a stream, immediately downstream of an SSO, or pipes within an SSES area. These areas were deemed to be high priority and should not wait for its tributary basin to be completed.
Each basin was given a priority score based on a combination of structural and service condition criteria. These criteria were scored for each basin based on a significant amount of information available from the District’s gbaMS (George Butler Master Series) CMMS (computerized maintenance management software) which is used to track the inventory and work order associated with the District’s assets. Information used in the analysis included CCTV data, work order histories, failure history, Preventative Maintenance history, and its vicinity to a known SSO.
The CSAP was split into two phases; the Assessment Phase and then the Implementation Phase which includes a Cleaning Program and Rehabilitation Program Component. The program was designed to inspect the entire District’s service area at least once within 10 years, but will include the assessment of an equivalent system length within 5 years from reoccurring inspections. This is due to the fact that some critical assets may be inspected twice before some are assessed once. This is the necessary result of the Asset Management approach.
A process flow chart was then developed that includes a detailed decision-making procedure for conducting initial inspections as well as re-inspection and re-cleaning frequencies, which depend on the asset’s observed condition and criticality. The process flow chart also includes a method to assign assets a rehabilitation priority score of 1-3 based on several factors. The rehabilitation priority score is one of several criteria that will be used to develop, prioritize and implement rehabilitation projects.
The program also includes the development of an interim access database software tool that will automate the process flowchart that was developed. This tool takes the structural and maintenance SCREAM scores from the CCTV results and then lists the next step in the assessment process with a target date. These dates can then be used to develop timely work orders that will then be tracked in the District’s gbaMS CMMS software. The interim tool will be replaced in the near future with a permanent tool that will work with gbaMS to automatically generate work orders for the next action based on the inspection results.
With limited external funding sources for infrastructure improvements, municipal utilities are challenged to develop cost-effective O&M programs. A prioritized and proactive approach for sewer system assessment and rehabilitation provides a way to identify and justify to the stakeholders and regulators those sewers and manholes where rehabilitation dollars will have the greatest benefit.
The overall goal of this program is to provide a structured framework to an Asset Management approach to managing the District’s sewer system assets in the most cost-effective and timely manner. The process flow diagram as designed will:
The rehabilitation portion of the program is being integrated with the Watershed Planning to ensure the most cost effective rehabilitation/replacement program is being implemented. The process flowcharts in Appendix A show how rehabilitation priorities interact with Watershed Planning priorities. The goal is to avoid scheduling a pipe rehabilitation/replacement without knowing where it stands relative to Watershed Planning. If upsizing is needed, then the decision on timing and method of construction can change dramatically.
For a copy of the full paper, please contact Sean FitzGerald at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Hear about new publications with our email newsletter
Horizons showcases significant water, wastewater, reuse, and stormwater projects and innovations that help our clients to achieve their goals, and can help you achieve yours. Articles are written by top engineers and process group leaders, demonstrating and explaining the beneficial application of a variety of technologies and tools.