In anticipation of increasing potable water needs on its campus due to a growing population, and faced with a lack of additional water supplies in the area, the University of Connecticut selected Hazen and Sawyer to implement a long-term, sustainable program that would reuse appropriately-treated effluent from its wastewater treatment plant for non-potable purposes, such as feedwater for both its Centralized Utilities Plant, or CUP (which includes boiler, chilled water, and cooling tower water systems) and turf irrigation.
One of the driving factors behind this project was the limited capacity of UCONN water sources. The UCONN system has two permitted groundwater sources: the Fenton and Willimantic River wellfields. In September 2005, a portion of the Fenton River ran dry – an event attributed to elevated water withdrawals necessary to meet the seasonal peak demand during drought conditions.
While such an event has not since been repeated, the potential for recurrence prompted UCONN to implement several restoration and conservation measures. A modification of the withdrawal management protocols at the Fenton River wellfield was implemented; this involved ceasing pumping of the Fenton River wells based on specific streamflow criteria. With these new limits placed on the Fenton River wellfield – coupled with lower yield from the Willimantic River wellfield – UCONN found it necessary to identify other sources of water to consistently meet demands and preserve natural resources. The University’s focus on sustainability led to the decision to implement a reuse program.
Prior to this project, only one wastewater reclamation permit had been issued by CT-DEP: for the Lake of Isles reuse project, involving golf course irrigation using treated effluent from a wastewater treatment plant owned by the Mashantucket tribe. Since that application was located on tribal lands, no formal guidelines or regulations regarding wastewater reuse had been developed by CT-DEP. Additionally, based on the limited number of reuse projects undertaken in the Northeast, regulatory requirements or guidelines for such projects have not been instituted in most states.
The UCONN project thus sets an important precedent in terms of establishing regulatory guidelines for the growing reuse practice. Hazen and Sawyer drew upon its extensive reuse experience in Florida, coupled with its work helping New Jersey develop reuse regulations for a reclaimed wastewater initiative, to provide UCONN with the knowledge and resources to apply an established regulatory framework to Connecticut. This, coupled with our expertise in analyzing technologies to meet stringent water quality parameters, helped ensure regulatory acceptance of the UCONN project, opening doors for future reuse programs in the Northeast.
Following initial evaluations of water supply and demand, Hazen and Sawyer developed and evaluated several cutting-edge treatment process alternatives to determine the most efficient, practicable, and sustainable solution for UCONN.
After evaluating three alternatives, we recommended the most advantageous option for treating effluent from the wastewater treatment facility, sized to produce up to 1 mgd of reclaimed water. The selected alternative utilizes microfiltration (MF) to treat wastewater effluent before its use as boiler feedwater and makeup for cooling towers and chillers. MF is an innovative, effective treatment process that removes both contaminants and pathogens by filtration through a porous membrane. Treated (“reclaimed”) water from the MF system will then be sent to an upgraded, existing Reverse Osmosis system for use as feedwater for the CUP boilers. RO treatment is not needed for the makeup water for the cooling tower and chilled water systems – water from the MF system can be used directly in these facilities. Reclaimed water from the new MF treatment system will also be used for irrigation on campus.
For disinfection, both ultraviolet (UV) light and liquid sodium hypochlorite were considered. While both methods would meet the required disinfection goals, UV was found to be more cost-effective, and was thus selected as the preferred option. However, the water entering into the new reclaimed water storage tank requires a chlorine residual to prevent bacterial regrowth. A small dose of sodium hypochlorite will be used as a secondary disinfectant to maintain the required residual.
on this project, or to discuss a similar project in your area, contact
Robert Smith, P.E.. at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)© Copyright 2012 Hazen and Sawyer.