Biofiltration - Best Practices for Design and Operation

Authors:

  • Ben Stanford PhD, Erik Rosenfeldt PhD, PE, Bill Becker PhD, PE, Jim DeWolfe PE, BCEE - Hazen and Sawyer

There are six advantages of BAF over conventional filtration, outlined above.

Biologically active filtration (BAF) is a cost-effective, multi-barrier water treatment process that provides a broad foundation for controlling taste and odors, removing DBP precusors and other contaminants, and increasing water stability.

Biologically active filters remove problematic contaminants by biodegradation, adsorption, and filtration of solids. By adding a preoxidant such as chlorine or ozone in front of the filter, then removing that oxidant upstream or in the top few inches of the filter, a natural biofilm can develop on the surfaces of filter media.

The highly porous structure of GAC provides a large surface area for supporting the growth of microorganisms.

The chart above displays run times observed during three years of BAF operation at one client facility, highlighting significantly reduced filter run time with increased temperature. Techniques including nutrient balancing and the addition of mild disinfectants like hydrogen peroxide can improve run times, as shown in Summer of 2012 and 2013 (compared to 2011), but better filter design or additional filters are needed to account for biological growth during warmer weather.

Other common challenges of BAF include "sloughing" of surplus biological material (after it grows very thick) from the filters and occasional periods of low-efficiency maganese removal.

While biofiltration has many benefits and often produces a finished water that is safer and more aesthetically pleasing, there are some limitations that must be addressed by proper design and operations.

Treating reclaimed water effluent to drinking water standards requires integration of treatment goals, design, and operation.

Biologically active filtration (BAF) is a cost-effective, multi-barrier water treatment process that provides a broad foundation for controlling taste and odors, removing DBP precursors and other contaminants, and increasing water stability.

The suitability of adding BAF to any given water treatment plant requires an examination of potential benefits and costs. Providers challenged by trying to control disinfection byproducts (DBPs), taste/color/odor issues, algal toxins, industrial or wastewater contaminants, or reducing assimilable organic carbon (AOC) to enhance stabilization can often achieve major improvement with the proper operation of BAF. That said, proper operation can require significant capital investment, in addition to new challenges for operators.

Comparison to Conventional Filtration

There are six advantages of BAF over conventional filtration:

  • Better Contaminant Removal: BAF more readily removes microbial, organic, and inorganic contaminants than conventional filtration.

  • Improved Taste: Removes difficult to treat geosmin and methyl-Isoborneol (MIB) compounds that cause earthy or musty tastes and odors.

  • Reduced Solids Production: Reduces residual solids production and resulting handling costs as biofiltration can facilitate decreased coagulant and Powdered Activated Carbon use.

  • Increased Water Stability: Increases water stability within the distribution system due to the reduction in AOC and biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC).

  • Reduced DBP Formation: Reduction of organic carbon consequently reduces the formation potential of DBPs, such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, and provides removal of NDMA.

  • Flexibility to Water Changes: Takes advantage of co-metabolism and organism population restructuring as the nature of constituents in source water changes over time to consume a variety of emerging contaminants.
  • Characteristics and Components

    Biologically active filters remove problematic contaminants by biodegradation, adsorption, and filtration of solids. By adding a preoxidant such as chlorine or ozone in front of the filter, then removing that oxidant upstream or in the top few inches of the filter, a natural biofilm can develop on the surfaces of filter media.

    Challenges and Considerations

    While biofiltration has many benefits and often produces a finished water that is safer and more aesthetically pleasing, there are some limitations that must be addressed by proper design and operations.

    One of the more common biofiltration challenges we help clients address is that of reduced filter run times. Our consistent observation has been that warmer water temperature and/or higher nutrient concentrations will increase biological growth on the filters, producing hydraulic constraints. Techniques including nutrient balancing and the addition of mild disinfectants like hydrogen peroxide can improve run times, but better filter design or additional filters are needed to account for biological growth during warmer weather.

    Other common challenges of BAF include “sloughing” of surplus biological material (after it grows very thick) from the filters and occasional periods of low-efficiency maganese removal. Each of these problems can be overcome with sound design and deliberate operation.

    Considerations in Potable Reuse

    BAF is an integral component to non-reverse osmosis membrane based DPR treatment systems. Biofiltration in conjunction with coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation serves as a combined barrier to pathogen removal and stabilizes water chemistry by removing readily biodegradable organic matter that is produced during ozonation. BAF also removes disinfection byproducts (DBPs) such as NDMA that are formed during ozonation and provides a low turbidity water for subsequent GAC treatment.

    Sound design practices ensure that there are no unintended consequences such as underdrain plugging or excessively short filter runs. The design and operation of BAF systems for potable reuse vary depending on treatment goals and overall risk mitigation strategies. For example, in some cases BAF may be sized and operated primarily for nitrification or denitrification purposes rather than as a primary mechanism of turbidity removal. In other cases, BAF in conjunction with upstream coag/floc/sed may be a major part of overall pathogen reduction objectives. These roles must be clearly defined to ensure BAF meets the desired water quality goals.

    For more information, please contact the author at erosenfeldt@hazenandsawyer.com.

    Hear about new publications with our email newsletter

    We will never share your details with anyone else.

    Horizons

    Newsletter Newsletter

    Horizons Fall 2017 (pdf)

    Horizons showcases significant water, wastewater, reuse, and stormwater projects and innovations that help our clients to achieve their goals, and can help you achieve yours. Articles are written by top engineers and process group leaders, demonstrating and explaining the beneficial application of a variety of technologies and tools.

    View previous issues »